![]() She has defended it in other aspects, but other historians have said the project's accounting of U.S. In 2020, she won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary for her essay in The 1619 Project. Now, the new book, The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story, expands upon that initial initiative. ![]() She told Fox News Digital that despite her objections to the claim that the American Revolution was fought to preserve the institution of slavery, The Times went forward with it anyway. Nikole Hannah-Jones is a domestic correspondent for The New York Times Magazine focusing on racial injustice. ![]() The most significant error was that The American Revolution was fought in order to preserve slavery when most historians say it was a disrupter of slavery.ĭuring the fact-checking process, The Times reached out to Leslie Harris, a professor at Northwestern who has specialized knowledge of pre-Civil War American history, to help verify some claims. It won a Pulitzer Prize but has come under criticism for some historical inaccuracies.Īfter the project was published, five historians penned a letter to The New York Times demanding corrections for the errors they found. RT MSNBC: Republicans spent years targeting Nikole Hannah-Jones’ 'The 1619 Project, but her reporting has threatened the conservative psyche for years. ![]() Hannah-Jones' six-part docuseries is based on her New York Times work of the same name that sought to put slavery and its consequences at the center of the founding and history of the United States. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |